Across the country, state leaders are increasingly questioning the long-term sustainability of property taxation. In Texas, that discussion has moved beyond incremental relief and into a broader conversation about structural reform of the property tax system itself.
Recent proposals from Governor Greg Abbott and Lt. Governor Dan Patrick outline significant changes to how property taxes are levied, limited, and potentially reduced, and in some cases eliminated for homeowners. While both leaders share the goal of delivering meaningful tax relief, their approaches differ in scope and structure.
Governor Abbott’s Five-Step Plan to Overhaul the Property Tax System
Governor Greg Abbott has framed his approach as a structural overhaul of the local property tax system. Texas has already delivered $51 billion in property tax relief in recent years, yet local jurisdictions continue to increases local tax levies eroding much of those gains.
The Governor’s reform plan centers on five major components:
-
- Limiting local government spending growth to the lesser of population growth, inflation, or 3.5%;
- Mandating a two-thirds voter approval requirement on all property tax increases;
- Empowering voters to roll back taxes through a rollback election triggered by a petition signed by 15% of registered voters;
- Creating appraisal predictability and capping appraisal growth by appraising properties once every five years, lowering the homestead appraisal cap from 10% to 3%, and expanding appraisal caps to all properties; and
- Eliminating school property taxes for homeowners through a constitutional amendment.
Taken together, these reforms could significantly limit the growth of local tax collections while opening the door to partial elimination of school district property taxes for homesteads.
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick’s “Operation Double Nickel”
While Governor Abbott’s plan focuses on structural constraints and potential elimination of school property taxes for homeowners, Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick has advanced a complementary but more incremental property tax relief strategy under the banner “Operation Double Nickel.”
Operation Double Nickel seeks to expand relief primarily through increased homestead exemptions and earlier eligibility for the senior school district homestead exemption. The key elements include:
-
- Lowering the age for the senior homestead exemption and tax freeze from 65 to 55 years old;
- Increasing the school homestead exemption for all homeowners by an additional $40,000; and
- Encouraging legislation to restrict excessive local taxing authority growth through responsible budgeting practices.
In addition to unveiling Operation Double Nickel, Lt. Governor Patrick formally directed the Texas Senate Finance Committee to study further property tax cuts as part of his Round One release of Interim Legislative Charges. The Senate Finance Committee has been instructed to:
-
- Study and report on the continued expansion of the homestead exemption; and
- Assess the fiscal and taxpayer impact of lowering the senior homestead exemption eligibility age from 65 to 55.
This interim charge signals that property tax relief remains a top-tier legislative priority heading into the next session. By directing a formal fiscal review through Senate Finance, the Lt. Governor is positioning Operation Double Nickel as a policy initiative subject to budget analysis, revenue modeling, and long-term structural consideration. The committee’s findings will likely shape the scope of future constitutional amendments, exemption expansions, and additional reforms considered by the Legislature.
Policy Considerations
Both proposals aim to deliver substantial property tax relief, but they also raise significant fiscal and structural considerations, particularly when viewed in the context of how Texas funds local government services. In 2025, the total statewide property tax levy reached approximately $89.55 billion, exceeding the roughly $86.69 billion in total state tax collections. That comparison underscores the central role property taxes play in financing public education and local government operations. Any effort to significantly reduce, cap, or eliminate property taxes must address how to replace or restructure a revenue source that rivals the state’s primary tax collections.
Governor Abbott’s proposal emphasizes appraisal caps, spending limits tied to population growth and inflation, supermajority voter approval requirements for tax increases, and the potential elimination of school district property taxes for homeowners. While appraisal caps and limits on taxable value growth can restrain rapid increases in individual tax bills, they also compress the overall growth of the tax base. When revenue needs remain constant, particularly for bonded indebtedness, public safety, and school finance formulas, limiting value growth on the tax roll can place upward pressure on tax rates. In other words, when taxable value growth is capped, jurisdictions may respond by adjusting rates within legal limits to generate necessary revenue, effectively shifting the tax burden among property classes rather than eliminating it entirely.
Lt. Governor Patrick’s Operation Double Nickel similarly narrows the tax base by expanding homestead exemptions and lowering the age at which property taxes are frozen. While this approach preserves the underlying structure of property taxation, it reduces the portion of value subject to taxation and increases reliance on the state to maintain school funding levels. As more value is exempted, the remaining taxable property, including commercial, rental, and non-homestead property, may bear a relatively larger share of the levy. Over time, these structural tax shifts raise important questions about sustainability, equity among property classes, bond market implications, and the long-term fiscal balance between state and local responsibilities.
Together, both plans highlight the central policy challenge facing Texas and other states now considering similar reforms or elimination proposals: how to deliver meaningful property tax relief while maintaining stable and predictable funding for schools, infrastructure, and essential fundamental local government services, such as emergency services. As reforms constrain value growth or remove property from the tax roll, the interaction between taxable value, tax rates, and expenditure commitments becomes increasingly consequential.